Why is open source important (or not) for hardware wallets?
What is open source ?
Open source literally means that the software's source code is publicly available. Anyone can see how the program works, find bugs, and even suggest improvements. This makes the software completely transparent: you don't have to blindly trust the manufacturer, because everything is verifiable.
This openness aligns perfectly with the philosophy of crypto: no closed systems where banks or companies can tamper behind the scenes, but complete transparency. Because the code is public, users know there are no hidden functions that could misuse their data or coins.
Examples of open source
A famous example is Linux, an operating system started as a hobby project by Linus Torvalds in 1991. Linux is now the basis for Android and the most widely used operating system in the world – built by thousands of open-source developers.
In the crypto world, Bitcoin Core and Ethereum are well-known open-source projects. Developers worldwide voluntarily contribute to the code, report bugs, and add new features. This accelerates bug discovery and keeps innovation flowing.
Why is open source important for crypto and blockchain?
There are two main reasons:
-
Transparency and trust
Just like with Bitcoin, the key is that it's impossible to cheat. Because the source code is open, anyone can verify that the system works fairly. -
Innovation
Open source makes it possible to build new projects on existing code. Think of dApps on Ethereum or improvements to the Bitcoin software. This way, the technology continues to develop rapidly.
The benefits of open source
- Collaboration and innovation – Developers worldwide can try out new ideas immediately.
- Security – Because the code is public, anyone can test it and report bugs. This often makes the software more secure than proprietary alternatives.
- Accessibility – Open source is usually free, allowing anyone to contribute, regardless of background or budget.
At the same time, there are also drawbacks: programmers aren't automatically paid, and malicious actors can still access the code. That's why initiatives like Gitcoin are emerging, where developers receive rewards in crypto for their contributions via blockchain.
And what about hardware wallets ?
Hardware wallets are physical devices that store your private keys offline, preventing hackers from accessing them via the internet. But the question remains: should the software and firmware of such a wallet be open source or not?
The benefits of open source wallets
With open-source wallets like Trezor , the source code is public. Anyone can verify that there are no backdoors and that the wallet does what it promises. This fits perfectly with the philosophy of crypto: don't trust, verify .
- Transparency: the user does not have to blindly trust the manufacturer.
- External audits: Independent researchers and the community can continuously review the code.
- Flexibility: Developers can contribute updates and improvements more quickly.
The disadvantages and criticisms
However, open source also has its challenges.
- Not everyone can check it: most users lack the technical knowledge to understand the code. They still have to rely on experts.
- Hackers are watching: malicious actors have just as much access to the code. Although this isn't often a major problem, because security is actually strengthened by public audits.
- Physical security is often lacking: Trezor doesn't use a "secure element" chip (an extra-secure chip used in devices like passports and bank cards). This theoretically makes it possible to bypass the security with physical access to the device.
The alternative: closed wallets
Manufacturers like Ledger deliberately choose a partially closed approach. Their firmware and interface are partially open source, but the code for the secure chip remains secret. Ledger claims this approach is more secure because:
- Secure elements are more resistant to physical attacks.
- Hackers cannot simply analyze the functioning of the chip.
- They have more resources to rigorously test and quickly patch their own code.
However, critics say this goes against the crypto philosophy of transparency: you have to completely trust the manufacturer that there are no backdoors in the closed code.
The balance
The discussion boils down to a balance between transparency and physical security:
- Open-source wallets provide maximum visibility and independence, but sometimes have less physical protection.
- Closed wallets offer strong security chips, but require more trust in the manufacturer.
Conclusion
Open source is essential for crypto and blockchain because it ensures transparency, collaboration, and innovation. For hardware wallets, open source offers an extra layer of trust, but it's not the only factor. The security of your wallet also depends on the quality of the hardware, the manufacturer's reputation, and external audits.
Whether you choose an open-source wallet like Trezor or a closed one like Ledger, the most important thing is that you understand the differences and which risk profile suits you.
